Benefit cheat has jail term cut by Court of Appeal

A BENEFIT cheat who was jailed for making £75,000 of bogus claims over seven years has had her prison term halved by the Court of Appeal.

Andrea Blakeburn, 46, was jailed for more than two years in November after she admitted benefit fraud, but three of the UK’s most senior judges today (Thursday, March 7) ruled that the original sentence had been excessive.

Blakeburn claimed housing benefit, council tax benefit and income support as a single mother between 2003 and 2010 after failing to tell the authorities her boyfriend had moved into her Darlington home.

Her lies were uncovered when her partner, Ronald Thomas, was found hiding under the bed-covers at her home in Pateley Moor Crescent by suspicious council officials.

The mother-of three was jailed for two years and four months in November last year after she admitted 10 counts of making false statements and two of failing to notify a change in circumstances at Teesside Crown Court.

Blakeburn had received excess payments worth more than £51,000 in income support and more than £23,000 in housing benefit and council tax benefit.

In sentencing, Judge Simon Bourne-Arton told Blakeburn that he was sending a message from the court that “whatever the mitigation, people who carry out benefit fraud to this extent will go to prison”.

He described the cheating as "persistent, deliberate and determined".

But Sir David Calvert-Smith, sitting with Lord Justice Davis and Mr Justice Silber, at the Court of Appeal in London agreed with a challenge from Blakeburn’s lawyers that the original sentence was too long and had too high a starting point.

Sir David said: "We agree this sentence was manifestly excessive. There were no features in the case, in our judgment, which should have taken it outside the guideline range of sentence.

"In our judgment, the proper starting point was in the region of 15 to 16 months and, bearing in mind the early guilty plea and the other features involved, we propose to reduce it to a sentence of 10 months. To that extent the appeal is allowed."

The court also heard that Blakeburn began paying back the money owed to Darlington Borough Council before she started her prison term.

Comments(4)

stevegg says...
5:03pm Thu 7 Mar 13

How ironic that the very system and authorities this woman abused - she has now used, obviously at further expense to taxpayers via legal aid, to secure a reduced sentance. Most of that money will ever be recovered and when released she will be another drain on taxpayers who will have to support her. These people should be barred for life from receiving any benefits after conviction, maybe that would make them think twice.

Spy Boy says...
5:11pm Thu 7 Mar 13

Why are the legal eagles so different in their handling of this case ? Why is there not a simple set of penalties ? Depending on your crime you get a fixed penalty. No time off for good behaviour. Behave yourself and you only do your fixed term. Cause trouble and you stay in jail longer.

Our whole benefits system is a joke. People come up with a system and then politicians fiddle with it to suit their plans.

Darloresident says...
7:25pm Thu 7 Mar 13

Maybe we should all lie when claiming benefits..The penalty for stealing £74,000 from the state is only 10 months (according to the judiciary)That is of course assuming you get caught...
What sort of message is sent out to these criminals?
I am in despair

Craz3yk says...
3:48pm Fri 8 Mar 13

I would go to jail £75000 dam right 10 month what a pay out

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree