Decision on Pittington opencast draws near

The Advertiser Series: Residents opposed to Hargreaves' plans Residents opposed to Hargreaves' plans

A DECISION on whether a firm should be allowed to opencast in countryside on the outskirts of Durham is drawing near.

Hargreaves Surface Mining wants to dig up to 514,000 tonnes of coal and up to 83,000 tonnes of fireclay from under farmland known as Field House, between West Rainton and Pittington, east of Durham City.

A planning application was submitted some months ago and the issue is expected to go before Durham County Council’s strategic county planning committee within a few weeks, possibly as early as Tuesday, March 4.

Local county councillors Stephen Guy and David Hall are urging villagers to make their views known on the proposals by emailing: dmstrategic@durham.gov.uk or writing to: Planning – Strategic, County Hall, Durham, DH1 5UL.

The planning reference is CMA/4/107.

In a statement, the councillors said: “We have both received numerous questions and representations about the proposal, mainly by local residents and businesses who have concerns about disruption to their lives and business operations.

“The level of interest in the proposal locally has led us to meeting with and supporting a local group who are working together to research the potential impact of the proposed mining operation on their communities.

“Their findings and concerns will be presented to the county council and factored into the decision making on the Hargreaves Surface Mining Limited application.”

A debate on the issue was held tonight (Monday, February 3) in Durham.

The mining would last about two years and three months, followed by years of restoration work.

Esh Winning-based Hargreaves says the project would create jobs, boost business and eventually improve the landscape.

Villagers are concerned about noise, traffic and dirt from the operation.

Comments (2)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

3:34pm Mon 3 Feb 14

Voice-of-reality says...

Given how much the region whinges about 'the loss of coal', 'the callous tories closing the pits' (ignoring history), and how 'life was great with coal' - the decision should eb straightforward. Surely, 'the whole region' is behind this - or are the usual pro-coal whingers just a bunch of hypocrits stuck in the past - who, when faced with an actual proposal for coal (or prosperity through embracing a new form of power - fracking), decide that thye don;t really want it - prefering instead to live a life on benefits.
Given how much the region whinges about 'the loss of coal', 'the callous tories closing the pits' (ignoring history), and how 'life was great with coal' - the decision should eb straightforward. Surely, 'the whole region' is behind this - or are the usual pro-coal whingers just a bunch of hypocrits stuck in the past - who, when faced with an actual proposal for coal (or prosperity through embracing a new form of power - fracking), decide that thye don;t really want it - prefering instead to live a life on benefits. Voice-of-reality

3:51pm Mon 3 Feb 14

David Lacey says...

It won't go ahead. The residents of West Rainton and Pittington are mostly well heeled professionals on retired people who will have pulled strings behind the scenes. I'd be amazed if the license is approved.
It won't go ahead. The residents of West Rainton and Pittington are mostly well heeled professionals on retired people who will have pulled strings behind the scenes. I'd be amazed if the license is approved. David Lacey

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree