Council chiefs apologise after Darlington homes plan consultation row

The Advertiser Series: GREEN AND PLEASANT: The proposed development site at Muscar House Farm, Darlington GREEN AND PLEASANT: The proposed development site at Muscar House Farm, Darlington

COUNCIL chiefs have apologised after residents who opposed plans for 90 homes on farmland on the outskirts of Darlington criticised the consultation process.

A 29-acre site at Muscar House Farm, off Barmpton Lane, on the eastern fringe of the town, is included in Darlington Borough Council's draft Making and Growing Places (MGP) document.

MGP sets out dozens of proposals for possible future housing sites across the borough up to 2026.

The latest round of consultations ended earlier this month and residents near Muscar House Farm were unhappy with the way it was carried out.

Dozens of residents opposed to the Muscar House Farm site being earmarked for development have displayed 'No' placards in their properties.

Judith Murray, one of the residents leading opposition to the plan, said dozens of members of the 'No' campaign attended a consultation earlier this month.

She said the event was 'very poor', with residents attending having familiarised themselves with what was initially being proposed, only for alternative plans to be put before them at the meeting.

The council has apologised for the confusion, but said both options were put forward at the consultation event and officers would have been able to explain the differences to those present.

A council spokeswoman stressed nothing is set in stone yet, with MGP not set to be formally adopted until next year.

That is unlikely to appease residents living near Muscar House Farm, with the proposed housing site just 700 metres from the Grade II-listed water mill at nearby Batts Farm.

Mrs Murray said: "We started up a poster campaign and a Facebook group, and came up with standard letters of objection people could send to the town hall if they wanted.

"Obviously, they were free to use their own words, but we felt people would be more likely to get involved if there was a template available for them."

Other concerns raised by the objectors include:

  • The fact the proposals affect a greenfield site, rather than land previously used for development;
  • Potential flooding risk;
  • Lack of access to amenities - 80 per cent of the site is more than 300 metres from the nearest bus stop;
  • Possible harm to wildlife in the area, such as birds, water voles, bats and deer.

A council spokeswoman said: "While we appreciate [the consultation] may have caused confusion and apologise for any caused, the sole intention in presenting this new option was to give residents more up-to-date information and a fuller picture of what the potential development could be.

“We welcome the level of interest from residents so far and our officers are working through more than 750 responses on sites proposed across the borough.

"These will be analysed over the coming months and recommendations put forward in a report to the place scrutiny committee in October.

“Cabinet will decide in December which sites will be included, before it is considered by an independent Government inspector next summer."

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:56am Mon 21 Jul 14

stevegg says...

Thanks to population explosion and mass uncontrolled immigration (in the past decade) there just isnt enough housing to go round. There is only so much housing you can cram into the existing town itself without building on every single open space that is left. It is inevitable (like it or not) that sooner or later housing developments will have to be built on greenfield fringe sites in the borough to accommodate the influx. Darlington councils inept approach doesnt help. Nimbys will have to come to terms with this or move away.
Thanks to population explosion and mass uncontrolled immigration (in the past decade) there just isnt enough housing to go round. There is only so much housing you can cram into the existing town itself without building on every single open space that is left. It is inevitable (like it or not) that sooner or later housing developments will have to be built on greenfield fringe sites in the borough to accommodate the influx. Darlington councils inept approach doesnt help. Nimbys will have to come to terms with this or move away. stevegg
  • Score: 2

11:45am Mon 21 Jul 14

Copley23 says...

^he's wrong......we have plenty of housing without building shambolic little rabbit hutches. The point is, everyone wants THE best.....expectation
s of housing have changed and keeping up is impossible.

"Will a 2 bed flat do madam"..."no, I want a garden and my human rights tell me I can have one".....oh for crying out loud. Get a grip.

And check your figures before you start spouting immigration as a root cause. That's bunkum.
^he's wrong......we have plenty of housing without building shambolic little rabbit hutches. The point is, everyone wants THE best.....expectation s of housing have changed and keeping up is impossible. "Will a 2 bed flat do madam"..."no, I want a garden and my human rights tell me I can have one".....oh for crying out loud. Get a grip. And check your figures before you start spouting immigration as a root cause. That's bunkum. Copley23
  • Score: 1

1:57pm Mon 21 Jul 14

sensible says...

Don't use template letters! The council will bulk them all together and count them as one single objection. They could well do the same from individual letters that appear to be from one organised source. Letters that are clearly individual have a far better chance of being counted, even if the council ultimately ignore them!
Don't use template letters! The council will bulk them all together and count them as one single objection. They could well do the same from individual letters that appear to be from one organised source. Letters that are clearly individual have a far better chance of being counted, even if the council ultimately ignore them! sensible
  • Score: 1

2:46pm Mon 21 Jul 14

Chocmonster7 says...

The whole consultation period has been a mess and a sham. This group is lucky to have had an apology, it's more contact than most of the people opposed to the Bellburn Lane Field development have received from the Council!
The whole consultation period has been a mess and a sham. This group is lucky to have had an apology, it's more contact than most of the people opposed to the Bellburn Lane Field development have received from the Council! Chocmonster7
  • Score: 8

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree